not to mention his name in the book. In faculty meeting, Professor
Sinclair, father of a member of '93, moved that, "Because of the
betrayal of confidence placed in the class of '93, and because we
cannot think any other class is likely to be more trustworthy, the
publication of a class book be from this time prohibited." The motion
was tabled, but the faculty did vote to demand that proof sheets of
future publications be submitted to a faculty committee. This rule was
followed by '94, Dr. Conant and Dr. Haynes being chosen as
inspectors. A cartoon in the book showed the hands of the editors
being guided by the hand of the faculty. The book was dedicated to
Dr. Conant.
Graduation exercises went through a period of evolution between 1882
and 1894. The long ordeal was considerably lightened when the reading
of theses was discontinued, and the number of speakers
reduced. Candidates were still required to appear before a board of
examiners, three of whom were nominated by the alumni after 1885, but
these worthy gentlemen were not required to examine theses in 1887 or
thereafter. A few of the best theses were selected for reading at
graduation, subsequently only one. The last reading was in 1895.
Graduation was usually held in the chapel, occasionally in Mechanics
Hall. Apparently the conduct of the graduating class on these
occasions was not above reproach, for in 1885 the trustees passed a
most astonishing rule. As a safeguard against "gross impropriety" on
such occasions, they asserted the right of the Corporation to revoke
degrees at any time after graduation. This action produced several
gasps from the press, but since it was never brought to trial,
students accepted it complacently. One other break in the solemnity of
the annual event came in 1888, when as a protest against the system of
marking and award of prizes, one of the "first six" returned the
Salisbury prize to the astonished trustees.
The Commencement period of 1888 was also marked by the inauguration of
formal Class Day exercises. In 1892 the
|