of science to the common purposes of life. My principal object is to
qualify teachers for instructing the sons and daughters of farmers and
mechanics, by lectures or otherwise, in the application of
experimental chemistry, philosophy and natural history to agriculture,
domestic economy, the arts and manufactures.
But the Boynton plan went further; it directed that the subjects of
Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Architecture,
Chemistry and Metallurgy, should be taught, in addition to the
fundamental sciences and academics. It also embraced the then novel
requirement that these subjects be supplemented by
practical applications. Unquestionably, Dr. Sweetser had Ichabod
Washburn's previous proposition in mind when he wrote this provision
into the plan:
And these studies shall be arranged, and instruction given in them,
according to the wisdom and discretion of those to whose care this
institution is entrusted; it being understood that the course shall
include studies with text books and recitations, and lectures with
experiments, and all such practical applications of the use of tools
and instruments, and the working of machinery, as may be available, so
that the benefits of this school shall not be confined to the theories
of science, but as far as possible shall extend to that practical
application of its principles which will give the greatest advantage
in the affairs of life.
Chronologically, Ichabod Washburn's plan does not belong in the first
stage of the foundation. Its initial draft was submitted to the
trustees on December 2, 1865, and it was revised somewhat between then
and its final acceptance in March, 1866. He had committed himself,
however, at the organization meeting, and the members of the new
corporation were too engrossed in other matters to wonder whether the
ideas of their colleague would mesh with the original plan. It is to
Washburn's everlasting credit that he displayed not only an unselfish
spirit of cooperation, but a sincere desire to adapt his carefully
studied plan to the conditions in the Boynton letter of gift. This
appears clearly in his preamble:
I have long been satisfied that a course of instruction might be
adopted in the education of apprentices to mechanical employments,
whereby moral and intellectual training might be united with the
processes by which the arts of mechanism, as well as skill in the use
and adaptation of tools and
|